CALL US

Embezzlement Charges

  • Client indicted in Federal Court with embezzling over $350,000 from employer. Evidence was overwhelming. Result: After a guilty plea, pursuant to argument that theft took place almost 5 years before charge, that it was due to gambling addiction, and that if sent to prison for years, client could never get a job which would enable restitution (current employer aware of the charges). Client was sentenced to 1 year house arrest with work release, and 30 days to be served on weekends even though a “Federal guideline” sentence called for multiple years in prison.
  • Client indicted in Kentucky State Court with embezzling over $300,000 from employer. Although Commonwealth had extremely strong evidence, defense brought a possible defense to the prosecutor’s attention which would have caused the victim significant embarrassment. As a result of mediation, an agreement of shock probation and a much lower amount of restitution was agreed to by the parties.
  • Client indicted in Federal Court with stealing over $3,000,000 from his employer. After written argument and an extended oral hearing, court found that he stole $623,000 (he had admitted stealing $454,000). Which was $2,577,000 less than the FBI accused him of taking. The United States argued for a “guideline sentence” of 78-97 months. Based on my presentation, the court sentenced him to 60 months.
  • Client charged with embezzling several thousand dollars from his employer. Result: After the defendant provided documentation of background, the Commonwealth agreed to defendant’s admission into a diversion program. After completion of the diversion program and restitution made, case was dismissed and expunged.
  • Client charged in federal court with embezzlement from bank branch of which he was the manager. Result: plea bargain negotiated which resulted in a six month sentence in a halfway house and restitution.
  • Client indicted for theft from check cashing business when forged check cashed using false identity. Result: State moved to dismiss charges after pretrial investigation by defense caused additional evidence to be provided by check cashing business showing client innocent.
  • Client charged with embezzlement of large sum of money from her employer. After defense provided proof of actual sum client embezzled, she was admitted to a diversion program, after agreeing to restitution. When restitution is completed case will be dismissed. At that point, no trace will be left on client’s record.